Our sister company – Bid Wizard – has published a blog on ‘5 Questions to ask before responding to an RFT/RFP‘ that some of you may enjoy reading.
Their advice on ‘Do we have a team/depth of experience?’ is worth the ticket price alone!
Feel free to reach out to me if this is a topic close to your heart!
Happy Thanksgiving to all those who celebrate. So much to be thankful for this year with the crew GSJ Consulting – so a big shout out to all those who are helping us out on our journey of a thousand steps!
If you have been wondering where Alternative Fee Arrangements (AFAs) sit on the ladder of cost-saving for in-house counsel, wonder no more. This post [By-the-Hour Billing Torments Legal Departments. So Why Aren’t More Demanding Alternatives?] by Hugo Guzman on law.com yesterday (14/11/2023) will answer all your queries:
And, drum-roll
Not sure how everyone else interprets that data, but it looks like a very sad state of affairs to me.
Feel free to reach out to me if you want to discuss what this might mean to your business or law firm.
Yesterday (13/11) was World Kindness Day, and while I think that’s a great idea/concept – with the level of mental health issues that we have in the legal profession, you have to ask yourself:
Why doesn’t every law firm office have one of these benches?
I put a post up last week on LinkedIn, off the back of a very interesting blog by Jordan Furlong on his Substack feed: ‘The legal world in 10 years (if we’re really lucky)‘, that got some social media traction so I thought I would re-share here.
At the heart of my LinkedIn post was a comment Jordan makes on – what he calls – High-Value Retainers and the effect Gen AI will have on these fee arrangements. To quote:
High-Value Retainers
Thanks to Gen AI’s consumption of many traditional tasks, lawyers have moved up the value ladder, going beyond “bet-the-company” and “run-the-company” work to start offering “grow-the-company” work (or “advance-the-individual”). These are engagements in which lawyers ask: “How can I improve your situation? What are your near-term and long-term goals? How can I help you anticipate problems and prevent them before they happen? How can I bring you more stability and peace of mind? How can I be your advocate and counsellor in whatever you need?”
While I think Jordan’s point is an excellent one, mine was this: “Do you think this could work in 10 years time?“
Because if you think it could: Why are you waiting 10 years for AI to develop in order to have this conversation – have this conversation with your clients now!
In that, it’s not a 10+ years from now discussion. It’s not a 10+ years from now problem. It’s a HERE AND NOW problem and a here and now discussion.
The number of senior business development people, including Director level roles, I have spoken to over the years who “fell” into working in business development roles for professional services firms is remarkable! Yes, in most cases they had a relevant applicable skill-set that could be transferred and used in the new role: whether that be as an ex-lawyer, marketing graduate or communications professional; but, by and large, I think it’s fair to say that almost none of us saw a career advisor at school and asked what undergraduate and post graduate degrees we need in order to have a career in business development for a professional services firm*.
So I was really glad to read today, via the Legal Cheek blog, that Slaughter and May are to launch a business services grad scheme.
Although Slaughters are one of the few Magic Circle firms I never worked at or for, I have really admired them from the sidelines. Their focus on their core strategy is commendable. All of which, in my opinion, is reflected in their newly announce two year ‘Business Services Academy‘ program.
In a similar vein to grad rotations, Legal Cheek is reporting that the Academy program will consist of four rotations of six months each among:
Now, the very clever people you are, you’re think 4 into 3 doesn’t go – and you would be right. But, apparently the forth rotation is with the team you have enjoyed the most on your previous rotations and want to consider a career with, and I kind of like that!
So once again, the team at Slaughter and May are blazing a path, but please do we really need to say this:
It’s worth noting that this scheme does not lead to qualification as a solicitor.
Anyhow, if you are not fortunate enough to work at Slaughters – or, as Legal Cheek points out Addleshaw Goddard or DWF (who have similar programs), and really need to learn a thing or two about how business development in law firms actually works in practice, reach out to me!
* I would also add that a lot of that same thinking applies to lawyers trying to do business development, in that they have had no formal training in this skill!
Tesla, Elon Musk’s EV carmaker, published its Q3 results earlier today (Australia time). Profits plunged 44 per cent. But, from my perspective this was the interesting part: “after it cuts prices to boost sales“.
Let’s unpack that for a second: Tesla “slashed prices by around 25 per cent in the United States during the last year” – “putting the priority on sales rather than profit“.
As it happens, this is also a common trait of professional services firms: prioritizing getting the deal done over making an actual profit – including agreeing to heavy “volume discounts”.
As the Tesla results show though, any price discount you give comes directly from profit – not sales revenue.
So the price discount you offer your clients is essentially compounded on your bottom line – 10% is not 10%, it’s more like 30%.
Or in the case of Tesla: a 25% price discount has resulted in a 44% plunge in profit.
Something to think about when you are next thinking about what pricing options you have available to you.
And please, don’t follow this advice:
“I view it as a way to defend market share at the expense of margin” .
Kevin Roberts, director of industry insights and analytics at CarGurus, an online auto sales site
In professional services firms, market share should never Trump (pun intended) profit.
As usual, if you need any help with any of this, feel free to reach out.
This is a REALLY telling – and valuable – statistic from ‘Building client feedback programs that lawyers love: What CMOs say‘ by Jen Dezso – Director of Client Relations / Thomson Reuters:
Let’s get a realty check on that: Law firms that have a client experience (CX) feedback program can earn nearly twice the share of a client’s wallet, but less than one in three clients have been asked to participate in a client feedback program.
In business development we often talk about “low hanging fruit” and this seems like a ‘no brainer’ to me!
Get in touch if this is something that interests you. And, frankly, why should it not!
This week’s #tbt (Throwback Thursday) recommendation is a post I wrote back in August of 2018 – ‘Why most law firms don’t need to hire a head of pricing‘.
The reason I’d like to suggest that you go back in time and read an article I wrote back in 2018 is because of something I read on law.com earlier this week: ‘How Law Firms Are Still Losing Millions, Even After Hiring Pricing Specialists‘ by Andrew Malocussion.
If you don’t have time to read Andrew Malocussions article, and I suggest you do because it’s actually very interesting, the long and short of it is that the reason why big (read global) law firms are losing millions in revenue (opportunity) is because…
… their pricing teams are too small.
All I have to say is, “seriously”!
Do yourself a favour, go back in time 5 years and work out for yourself whether or not the fact that law firm pricing teams are too small is the real reason they may or may not be losing millions of dollars in revenue.
For my part, this type of thinking doesn’t pass the pub test!
Feel free to reach out to me if you want to talk through any pricing strategy related issues/questions.
3229 days – on average that’s how long it will take you to make partnership in 2023. And when I say “partnership”, I’m not talking about equity partnership.
Last week (15 August 2023), Marlene Gebauer and Greg Lambert interviewed Laura Leopard, founder and CEO of Leopard Solutions, on their ‘Geek in Review‘ podcast. It’s a really interesting chat around law firm partner succession plans (or lack thereof), which was actually the primary topic of their conversation.
But, it was an insight that Laura shared at the 13 minutes and 21 second mark that had my hair standing up:
Two things to note here:
So what? After all, this information is useless unless put into context. What I mean here is this: Has this number changed at all over the past 10 years?
Well, as it happens, Laura shares this with us too.
On average then it is now [2023] taking new entrants about 5 years longer to make partnership than 10 years ago!
What can you do to make the path to partnership shorter?
Okay, you’ve decided you want to be a partner: What can you do to make the path to partnership – which, let’s face it, is growing by about 6 months every year – easier / quicker?
Here are a few tips you may want to consider to help make that happen:
Most importantly though, have a plan and if you think it will help hire a business development mentor / coach to help you reach your partnership goal.
On the rules of compound interest, a one hour talk each month with someone who knows how to build a book of business will take you a long way to achieving your goals quicker than the industry norms.
As always, feel free to reach out to me for a free chat if you want to talk through how I can help with this.
RWS_01's B[D]log 