Aisa

China – a tale of two very different strategies…

A tale of two very different strategies

Contrast this:

“…over the last two years the number of Am Law 100 lawyers based in Beijing and Shanghai has declined by 25% from 569 to 424. The decline over a five-year period is 35%.”

John Malpas in the Global Legal Post 6 December 2024

With this:

Over the past 12 months, Chinese Law Firms DeHeng, JunHe, Fangda Partners and Han Kun Law Offices have established overseas offices in Singapore, the U.S., Indonesia, South Korea, Vietnam, and the Middle East

Summary, not direct quote, from: by Jessica Seah on law.com 13 December

In-bound versus Out-bound referral work

Having worked with law firms around the world for close to 30 years to help establish their overseas offices (with a particular focus on Asia), I’m not sure I have ever seen such a significant shift in an in-bound/out-bound referral strategy.

In my view, we are now at the dawn of an era when Asian-based law firms are referring more work out of Asia than International law firms are referring work into Asia.

The only question that remains then is this: “How are you positioning your firm/practice to benefit from this shift?“.

Richard

📩 richard@gsjconsulting.com.au